linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] nohz_full: update cpu load fix in nohz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52A7C0F4.1000209@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:33:40 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, pjt@...gle.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
	james.hogan@...tec.com, jason.low2@...com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
	hanjun.guo@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] nohz_full: update cpu load fix in nohz_full

On 12/10/2013 10:02 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> >  		 * We were idle, this means load 0, the current load might be
>> >  		 * !0 due to remote wakeups and the sort.
>> > +		 * or we may has only one task and in NO_HZ_FULL, then still use
>> > +		 * normal cpu load.
>> >  		 */
>> > -		__update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0, pending_updates);
>> > +		if (this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running) {
>> > +			unsigned load = get_rq_runnable_load(this_rq);
>> > +			__update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, pending_updates);
>> > +		} else
>> > +			__update_cpu_load(this_rq, 0, pending_updates);
> But decay_load_missed() doesnt handle non 0 loads, right? It probably make more sense
> to first fix __update_cpu_load() to make it handle this kind of thing before fixing the caller.
> 
> Now you had patches that remove the cpu_load secondary idx I think? You should move this patc


Thanks for response!
Yes, after get your review, I plan to merge this patch with cpu_load
decay removing, if that patchset possible get to upstream. :)

-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/