[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131211020052.GA15638@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:00:52 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/62] 3.12.5-stable review
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:49:31PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 01:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.5 release.
> > There are 62 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu Dec 12 08:00:42 UTC 2013.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.5-rc1.gz
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Patch applied cleanly
> Compile testing - passed
> Boot testing - passed
> dmesg regression testing - passed
>
> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for
> this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in
> warn.
>
> Test systems
>
> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later)
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
> Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400
Thanks for testing all 3 and letting me know all is good.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists