[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:53:13 +0100
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
CC: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC
nodes
On 11/27/2013 02:04 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> The bindings for the TTC changed in commit 'arm: zynq: Use standard
> timer binding' (e932900a3279b5dbb6d8f43c7b369003620e137c). That change
> removed possible subnodes from this driver rendering the 'clock-ranges'
> property invalid for this node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
> Acked-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@...inx.com>
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
I think this is completely unrelated to cpufreq and should just go
directly via arm-soc tree.
If yes, I will add 1/9 and 2/9 to zynq/dt branch.
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (264 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists