[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:49:59 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jasowang@...hat.com,
wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:36:39 -0500 (EST) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:15:39 +1100
>
> > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/net/macvtap.c between commit ce232ce01d61 ("macvtap: signal
> > truncated packets") from the net tree and commit 55ec8e25cd97 ("macvtap:
> > remove unused parameter in macvtap_do_read()") from the net-next tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > is required).
>
> The net-next commit in question was reverted last night.
Actually, the only relevant revert in the net-next tree I fetched this
morning is commit de2aa4760b45 (Revert "macvtap: remove useless codes in
macvtap_aio_read() and macvtap_recvmsg()") which reverts 41e4af69a598,
not the commit mentioned above. Unless you haven't pushed out the
net-next tree with a later revert ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists