[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:46:10 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Vinayak Kale <vkale@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"patches@....com" <patches@....com>,
"jcm@...hat.com" <jcm@...hat.com>,
"sboyd@...eaurora.org" <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>, Tuan Phan <tphan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:33:59AM +0000, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> > Below fixup works fine on APM platform.
> > Do you want me to send this fixup as part of next revision of the
> > patch or will you apply it yourself? (For later case, you have my ack)
>
> Any comments? Do I need to send the fix-up in next revision of patch?
Looks fine to me; I've folded in my changes and applied it to my aarch64
branch. I'll queue it for 3.14 when Catalin and I start putting that
together.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists