[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:59:31 +0000
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Potentially unbounded allocations in seq_read?
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 13:49 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:40:40PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> > So this is the story... task_mmu.c:show_map_vma() calls seq_path. There
> > we have a d_path call which returns -ENAMETOOLONG and keeps doing so
> > even though the buffer grows to huge proportions. It is something on
> > tmpfs, don't know what.
> >
> > But in the meantime, shouldn't seq_path be a bit more considerate on
> > this particular error and not mark the state as "could not fit" forever?
> > Perhaps it would make sense to limit it a bit?
> >
> > Or even more so, on errors _other_ than -ENAMETOOLONG it will at the
> > moment mark the result as "need more space". That also sounds broken to
> > me.
>
> a) *what* errors other than -ENAMETOOLONG?
Is this your way of saying there can't be any other errors from d_path?
> b) d_path() not fitting into 2Mb is definitely a bug. If you really have
> managed to get a dentry tree 1 million levels deep, you have much worse
> problems.
> c) which kernel version it is?
3.10. I can't imagine this is an actual dentry tree somewhere, probably
just a bug of some sort. I'll probably hunt it down completely some time
next week, time permitting.
Regards,
Tvrtko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists