linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] net: macb updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:28:43 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] net: macb updates

On 12/12/2013 08:00, Olof Johansson :
> Hi Soren,
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Soren Brinkmann
> <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com> wrote:
>
>> Soren Brinkmann (5):
>>    net: macb: Adjust tx_clk when link speed changes
>
> This patch causes build issues on some at91 platforms, namely
> at91sam9263 that lacks programmable clocks. So it doesn't implement
> clk_set_rate() and clk_round_rate().
>
> I don't know if there's any reasonable config option to check for
> (that wouldn't add at91-specific stuff to the driver which we don't
> want). So I suspect the best way would be to implement dummy versions
> for at91 when CONFIG_AT91_PROGRAMMABLE_CLOCKS isn't set.
>
> Nicolas, you OK with that? It'd be something like the below
> (copy-paste, whitespace damage, just RFC):

Well, in fact I am thinking about simply removing this 
AT91_PROGRAMMABLE_CLOCKS option out of the AT91 Kconfig.

After all, when not specified, it only removes a few lines of code... 
and that's it! For a so little benefit, I suspect it is sensible to 
remove this option.
I continue to discuss with AT91 active developers and write a patch soon.

Thanks for the heads-up on this issue Olof.

Bye,


> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> index 6b2630a..17c52a7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/clock.c
> @@ -459,6 +459,22 @@ static void __init init_programmable_clock(struct clk *clk)
>          clk->rate_hz = parent->rate_hz / pmc_prescaler_divider(pckr);
>   }
>
> +#else  /* CONFIG_AT91_PROGRAMMABLE_CLOCKS */
> +
> +int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> +{
> +       if (rate == clk_get_rate(clk))
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
> +{
> +       /* There's really nothing sane to return here. */
> +       return clk_get_rate(clk);
> +}
> +
>   #endif /* CONFIG_AT91_PROGRAMMABLE_CLOCKS */
>


-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/