[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:11:07 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Mark Lord <kernel@...rt.ca>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] PCI/MSI: Introduce pcim_enable_msi*() family
helpers
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 05:11:01PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:16:02PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > What's the reason for using the "pcim_" prefix? To me, that suggests that
> > this is a "managed" interface in the sense described in
> > Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt, where resources are automatically
> > deallocated when the driver detaches. But I don't see anything like that
> > happening in this patch.
>
> Oh.. right. What about pci_auto_ prefix to indicate automatic fallback
> logic? Or may be even pcia_ ?
I'd vote for pci_auto, one-off single char pre/postfixes usually get
pretty confusing.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists