[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 02:23:17 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Christian Grothoff <grothoff@...tum.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, knock@...net.org, jacob@...elbaum.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TCP: add option for silent port knocking with
integrity protection
> ... and then do the same for the first TCP packet with payload? And you
That gets passed through by the firewall rule.
> seriously would consider that "safer" or "less error prone", starting
Yes the risk of adding exploitable holes to the kernel is signficantly
lower.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists