[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:02:41 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: olof@...om.net
Cc: whiteheadm@....org, linux@....linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: eth: 8390: remove section warning in etherh.c
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:53:00 -0800
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:46 AM, tedheadster <tedheadster@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Commit c45f812f0280 ('8390 : Replace ei_debug with msg_enable/NETIF_MSG_*
>>> feature') ended up moving the printout of version[] from something that
>>> will be compiled out due to defines, to something that is now evaluated
>>> at runtime.
>>>
>>> That means that what always used to be an access to an __initdata string
>>> from non-__init code started showing up as a section mismatch when it
>>> didn't before.
>>>
>>> All other 8390 versions skip __initdata on the version string, and
>>> starting to annotate the whole chain of callers with __init seems like
>>> more churn than it's worth on this driver, so remove it from etherh.c as
>>> well.
>>>
>>
>> Olof,
>> should you also remove the __init tag from etherh_banner() since it is
>> called from etherh_probe(), which does not have an __init tag?
>
> Hmm.
>
> The section warning functionality is clever enough to not trigger when
> a function is named _probe() and references __initdata, and discarding
> etherh_banner() should be just fine so I don't see a need to remove
> it.
Right, applied, thanks Olof.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists