linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] mfd: Move pm8xxx-irq.c contents into only driver that uses it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:06:18 -0800
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] mfd: Move pm8xxx-irq.c contents into only driver
 that uses it

On 12/11/13 01:35, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> The pm8xxx-irq.c code is practically mandatory given that the
>> pm8921-core driver will WARN about it missing and the Kconfig
>> marks it as default y when a PM8xxx chips is enabled. The only
>> reason the file was split out was because we planned to support
>> other pm8xxx chips with different pm8xxx-core.c files. Now that
>> we have DT on ARM this isn't necessary because we should be able
>> to support all the ssbi based PM8xxx chips in one driver and one
>> file with no data bloat. Let's move this code into the only
>> driver that uses it right now (pm8921) so that it's always compiled when
>> needed. In the future we can rename pm8921-core.c to something
>> more generic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig       |  10 --
>>  drivers/mfd/pm8921-core.c | 349 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  drivers/mfd/pm8xxx-irq.c  | 371 ----------------------------------------------
> If you're going to take this approach (which I'm fine with unless
> there are likely to be anymore incarnations of pm8xxx chips?), I think
> you should also clean-up the header in this patch.
>
>   include/linux/mfd/pm8xxx/irq.h
>

Thanks. I'll remove the header and resend.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/