[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 21:31:22 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] gpio: davinci: use {readl|writel}_relaxed() instead of __raw_*
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Prabhakar Lad
<prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>
> This patch replaces the __raw_readl/writel with
> {readl|writel}_relaxed(), Altough the code runs on ARMv5
> based SOCs, changing this will help copying the code
> for other uses.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
> ---
> This patch is part of series [1] rest of the patches
> are Acked/reviewed so posting this patch independently
> and marking it as v7.
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg13037.html
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Should I take this into the GPIO tree, or should it go
in through the DaVinci tree?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists