linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH CFT] ARM:S5P64X0: Enable ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and AUTO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Dec 2013 22:23:38 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	panchaxari <panchaxari.prasannamurthy@...aro.org>,
	Kgene Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH CFT] ARM:S5P64X0: Enable ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and
 AUTO_ZRELADDR by default

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com> wrote:
> 2013/12/12 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is actually quite a poor platform choice. As of today, the kernel
>>> is stuck with supporting just SMDK6440/6450 boards, which are proprietary
>>> development boards and it doesn't look like any further boards will show
>>> up in future. Kukjin has actually proposed removing support for this
>>> platform at all and I consider this reasonable.
>>>
>>> Kukjin, should we proceed with removal?
>>
>> Isn't Mark Brown using that platform for some various stuff?
>
> Not as far as I know.
>
> He's using Cragganmore board based on s3c6410, but this is a different
> platform (s3c64xx).

Ahhhh I see it now. So the S3C:s are actually in a lot of use
and the S5P is one of those stepping stones to Exynos that
never really was in any widespread use.

Yeah I'm all for deleteing that :-)

Thanks!
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/