[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52AA4E2C.3070605@zankel.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:00:44 -0800
From: czankel <chris@...kel.net>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
CC: "linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: Switch to sched_clock_register()
Hi Stephen,
Sorry for the delay. Will add it later today.
Thanks,
-Chris
On 12/12/13 3:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/20/13 10:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 11/17/13 12:27, Max Filippov wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>> The 32 bit sched_clock interface now supports 64 bits. Upgrade
>>>> to the 64 bit function to allow us to remove the 32 bit
>>>> registration interface.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Patch is based on Linus' tip. Not event compile tested.
>>>>
>>>> arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> Build and run-tested, appears to work.
>>> Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>
>>>
>>> Should it go through xtensa tree, or through some other tree as a part
>>> of a bigger conversion series?
>> If it can go through xtensa that sounds like the best option. Otherwise
>> we can send it through the tip/timers tree.
>>
> Ping? I don't see this patch in linux-next yet so should I send this
> through the tip/timers tree?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists