linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the first entry in the wait-list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:08:33 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Marek Szyprowski' <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the first
 entry in the wait-list


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:24:06AM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
> > Hello Ingo & Peter,
> > 
> > I added Greg on Cc.
> 
> > For quite a long time I've been sending the same SOB lines to the
> > linux-usb list.
> 
> Then Greg is more forgiving. Doesn't make it right though.

Also, it's easy to not notice, and it has no testable side effects.

Yet if mistakes _are_ noticed like in this case then the inconsistency 
should be fixed, as the SOB chains have specific meaning.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/