linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: integer overflow in megadev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:31:05 +0800
From:	Yu Chen <chyyuu@...il.com>
To:	Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, megaraidlinux@....com,
	xiaoqixue_1 <xiaoqixue_1@....com>,
	范文良 <fanwlexca@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: integer overflow in megadev_ioctl()

Thank you!  The new patch
-------------------------------------------------------------
[PATCH] scsi: integer overflow in megadev_ioctl()

There is a potential integer overflow in megadev_ioctl() if
userspace passes in a large u32 variable uioc.adapno.
Theint variable adapno would < 0, leading to a error
array access for hdb_soft_state[adapno], or a error
copy_to_user(uioc.uioc_uaddr, mcontroller+adapno,..)

Reported-by: Wenliang Fan <fanwlexca@...il.com>
Suggested-by: Qixue Xiao <xiaoqixue_1@....com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Chen <chyyuu@...il.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/megaraid.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
index 41bbc21..0b90c54 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
@@ -3099,7 +3099,10 @@ megadev_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int
cmd, unsigned long arg)
  /*
  * Which adapter
  */
- if( (adapno = GETADAP(uioc.adapno)) >= hba_count )
+ adapno = GETADAP(uioc.adapno);
+ if( adapno < 0 )
+ return (-EINVAL);
+ if( adapno >= hba_count )
  return (-ENODEV);

  if( copy_to_user(uioc.uioc_uaddr, mcontroller+adapno,
@@ -3113,8 +3116,10 @@ megadev_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int
cmd, unsigned long arg)
  /*
  * Which adapter
  */
-                adapno = GETADAP(uioc.adapno);
- if( adapno >= hba_count || adapno < 0 )
+ adapno = GETADAP(uioc.adapno);
+ if( adapno < 0 )
+ return (-EINVAL);
+ if( adapno >= hba_count )
  return (-ENODEV);

  adapter = hba_soft_state[adapno];
@@ -3161,7 +3166,10 @@ megadev_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int
cmd, unsigned long arg)
  /*
  * Which adapter
  */
- if( (adapno = GETADAP(uioc.adapno)) >= hba_count )
+ adapno = GETADAP(uioc.adapno);
+ if( adapno < 0 )
+ return (-EINVAL);
+ if( adapno >= hba_count )
  return (-ENODEV);

  adapter = hba_soft_state[adapno];
-- 
1.8.3.2

2013/12/14 Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/13/2013 05:55 PM, Yu Chen wrote:
>>  drivers/scsi/megaraid.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>> index 816db12..41bbc21 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
>> @@ -3113,7 +3113,8 @@ megadev_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int
>> cmd, unsigned long arg)
>>   /*
>>   * Which adapter
>>   */
>> - if( (adapno = GETADAP(uioc.adapno)) >= hba_count )
>> +                adapno = GETADAP(uioc.adapno);
>> + if( adapno >= hba_count || adapno < 0 )
>>   return (-ENODEV);
>
> Wouldn't returning -EINVAL be better? For hba_count I understand that
> -ENODEV is returned but for adapno being a passed variable, I would
> suggest returning -EINVAL.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Levente Kurusa



-- 
Best Regards
==============================================
Yu Chen
Ph.D.  Associate Professor
System Software&Software Engineering Group,
Dept. of Computer Science and Technology
Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China
E-Mail: mailto:yuchen@...nghua.edu.cn  chyyuu@...il.com
==============================================
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/