linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mach-moxart: add MOXA ART SoC platform files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131213190707.GA9713@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:07:07 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ARM: mach-moxart: add MOXA ART SoC platform files

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 06:23:44PM +0100, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> On 13 December 2013 17:17, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > IIRC the separate defconfig is needed because we have never gotten a mixed fa526+arm9
> > kernel to boot, right? In theory it is supposed to work and there is most likely just
> > a small bug somewhere. Once that is working, we can think about adding a generic
> > multi_v4_v5_defconfig that handles all multipltform capable platforms along the lines
> > of multi_v7_defconfig.
> 
> A mixed kernel can boot without panic (tested today).
> 
> The panic is avoided when CONFIG_ARM_THUMB=y is removed.
> 
> See thread "[PATCH] ARM: reinsert ARCH_MULTI_V4 Kconfig option":
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-December/219004.html
> 
> 
> > I've been out of the loop a bit here. I initially suggested having the restart
> > handler be part of the watchdog driver, and I thought you had done that in an
> > earlier version. What has changed your mind?
> 
> I got the impression from Guenter Roeck's review, that it doesn't belong there,
> maybe I was too quick to remove it?
> 
You'd have to answer the questions I raised in my review if you want it in
there.

Guenter

> See thread "[PATCH] watchdog: Add MOXA ART watchdog driver":
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-July/183065.html
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jonas
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/