[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131213211543.GI27070@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:15:43 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
Cc: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@...too.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: provide the ability to disable a disk via the
params.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:36:55PM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> >1.
> >Countering your nodisable comment, would it be valid to do:
> >libata.force=2:disable libata.force=2.02:nodisable
> >To disable all of port 2 except device 2?
>
> I think that makes sense and I support having 'nodisable'.
I really don't want to. Let's please add whatever is necessary for
fringe use cases but no more. It's not like this thing is generally
useful.
> >2. One of my friends wondered if it would be worthwhile to add force
> >keywords for other HORKAGE bits, and if so, should the
> >ata_lflag/ata_link force bits also be presented?
>
> I don't think so. Most of the other HORKAGEs are automatically
> recognized and applied by the code. I think the only ones
> which can cause trouble if not detected at first are the ones that are
> currently in the list.
Again, just whatever is immediately necessary, please.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists