[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52AB8B91.1020608@tremplin-utc.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:34:57 +0100
From: Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>
To: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
CC: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: platform: Mark functions as static in hp_accel.c
On 13-12-13 09:58, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:56:34PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote:
>> This patch marks the functions lis3lv02d_acpi_init(),
>> lis3lv02d_acpi_read() and lis3lv02d_acpi_write() as static in
>> x86/hp_accel.c because they are not used outside this file.
>>
>> Thus, it also eliminates the following warnings in x86/hp_accel.c:
>> drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c:91:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘lis3lv02d_acpi_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c:109:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘lis3lv02d_acpi_read’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c:132:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘lis3lv02d_acpi_write’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Yes, looks fine.
Signed-off-by: Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>
Matthew, could you pick this patch up in the platform-driver-x86 branch?
Cheers,
Éric
>
>> drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c b/drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c
>> index a8e43cf..01b619e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c
>> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, lis3lv02d_device_ids);
>> *
>> * Returns 0 on success.
>> */
>> -int lis3lv02d_acpi_init(struct lis3lv02d *lis3)
>> +static int lis3lv02d_acpi_init(struct lis3lv02d *lis3)
>> {
>> struct acpi_device *dev = lis3->bus_priv;
>> if (acpi_evaluate_object(dev->handle, METHOD_NAME__INI,
>> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ int lis3lv02d_acpi_init(struct lis3lv02d *lis3)
>> *
>> * Returns 0 on success.
>> */
>> -int lis3lv02d_acpi_read(struct lis3lv02d *lis3, int reg, u8 *ret)
>> +static int lis3lv02d_acpi_read(struct lis3lv02d *lis3, int reg, u8 *ret)
>> {
>> struct acpi_device *dev = lis3->bus_priv;
>> union acpi_object arg0 = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
>> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ int lis3lv02d_acpi_read(struct lis3lv02d *lis3, int reg, u8 *ret)
>> *
>> * Returns 0 on success.
>> */
>> -int lis3lv02d_acpi_write(struct lis3lv02d *lis3, int reg, u8 val)
>> +static int lis3lv02d_acpi_write(struct lis3lv02d *lis3, int reg, u8 val)
>> {
>> struct acpi_device *dev = lis3->bus_priv;
>> unsigned long long ret; /* Not used when writting */
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists