[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131214203121.GB4020@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:31:21 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...elcunningham.com.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, tomaz.solc@...lix.org,
aaron.lu@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata, freezer: avoid block device removal while system
is frozen
Hello, Nigel.
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:15:21AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> My understanding is that the point is ensuring that - particularly
> in the case of hibernation - we don't cause filesystem corruption by
> writing one thing while writing the image and then doing something
> else (without knowledge of what happened while the image was being
> written) while reading the image or after restoring it.
So, all this is about hibernation? Does that mean that it's safe to
unfreeze before invoking resume? ie. we currently do,
freeze
suspend devs
resume devs
unfreeze
If we can just do,
freeze
suspend devs
unfreeze
resume devs
it should be a lot better and would remove all locking dependency
chains in the resume path.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists