[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMxnaaXgJ9wcn62fMRWzoCaJ3T=NRnWFOphEEczw3_Z-ZPFxMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:50:17 +0100
From: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to reserve pci bus numbers for hotplug?
Done: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67001
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Andreas Noever
> <andreas.noever@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Andreas Noever
>>> <andreas.noever@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I could get Linux to assign enough resources (bus numbers for now)
>>>> then I could drop the acpi_osi parameter and make thunderbolt work
>>>> after suspend... So, is there an easy way to fix this? (Quirks,
>>>> reconfiguring bus number assignments from a platform driver, ...?)
>>>
>>> please check if busn_alloc at
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-yinghai.git
>>> for-pci-busn-alloc-3.14
>>>
>>> could help.
>>
>> It seems to help. The initial assignment looks good:
>> +-01.1-[05-9b]----00.0-[06-27]--+-00.0-[07]----00.0 Intel
>> Corporation DSL3510 Thunderbolt Port [Cactus Ridge]
>> | +-03.0-[08-0f]--
>> | +-04.0-[10-17]--
>> | +-05.0-[18-1f]--
>> | \-06.0-[20-27]--
>> After hotplug it looks like this:
>> +-01.1-[05-9b]----00.0-[06-29]--+-00.0-[07]----00.0 Intel
>> Corporation DSL3510 Thunderbolt Port [Cactus Ridge]
>> |
>> +-03.0-[08-11]----00.0-[09-11]----00.0-[0a-11]----00.0 Broadcom
>> Corporation NetXtreme BCM57762 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe
>> | +-04.0-[10-17]--
>> | +-05.0-[18-1f]--
>> | \-06.0-[20-27]--
>> (Note that the bridge numbers are not disjoint)
>>
>> dmesg is attached.
>>
>> What is the status of the patch? Will it be merged for 3.14?
>
> It's not on my radar yet, so likely won't make it for v3.14.
>
> Can you open a report at http://bugzilla.kernel.org and attach
> complete dmesg logs without and with Yinghai's patches, and also the
> complete "lspci -vv" output?
>
> Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists