[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131214205657.GQ17601@leaf>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:56:57 -0800
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: reset: Mark function as static in core.c
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:15:34PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 06:56:10PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote:
> > This patch marks the function of_reset_simple_xlate() and
> > devm_reset_control_put() as static in core.c because it is not used
> > outside this file.
> >
> > Thus, it also eliminate the following warnings in core.c:
> > drivers/reset/core.c:46:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘of_reset_simple_xlate’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > drivers/reset/core.c:262:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘devm_reset_control_put’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >
>
> These are EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() so that doesn't make sense.
> devm_reset_control_put() is not used at all and of_reset_simple_xlate()
> doesn't look like it needs to be exported. Philipp?
That sounds like the right fix to me: drop devm_reset_control_put and
its export completely, and drop the export of make
of_reset_simple_xlate. Unless there's some relevant out-of-tree caller
of either function, that seems sensible.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists