[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce02d52baac3730d659c046a181c2784c6cee2c4.1387007793.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:15:34 +0400
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC: <glommer@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<devel@...nvz.org>, Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] memcg: do not use vmalloc for mem_cgroup allocations
The vmalloc was introduced by patch 333279 ("memcgroup: use vmalloc for
mem_cgroup allocation"), because at that time MAX_NUMNODES was used for
defining the per-node array in the mem_cgroup structure so that the
structure could be huge even if the system had the only NUMA node.
The situation was significantly improved by patch 45cf7e ("memcg: reduce
the size of struct memcg 244-fold"), which made the size of the
mem_cgroup structure calculated dynamically depending on the real number
of NUMA nodes installed on the system (nr_node_ids), so now there is no
point in using vmalloc here: the structure is allocated rarely and on
most systems its size is about 1K.
Personally I'd like to remove this vmalloc, because I'm considering
using wait_on_bit() on mem_cgroup::kmem_account_flags in the kmemcg
shrinkers implementation, which is impossible on vmalloc'd areas.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 28 ++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 7f1a356..205eb7b 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@
#include <linux/sort.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
-#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/vmpressure.h>
#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
#include <linux/page_cgroup.h>
@@ -335,12 +334,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
/* WARNING: nodeinfo must be the last member here */
};
-static size_t memcg_size(void)
-{
- return sizeof(struct mem_cgroup) +
- nr_node_ids * sizeof(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *);
-}
-
/* internal only representation about the status of kmem accounting. */
enum {
KMEM_ACCOUNTED_ACTIVE = 0, /* accounted by this cgroup itself */
@@ -6139,14 +6132,12 @@ static void free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int node)
static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(void)
{
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
- size_t size = memcg_size();
+ size_t size;
- /* Can be very big if nr_node_ids is very big */
- if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
- memcg = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
- else
- memcg = vzalloc(size);
+ size = sizeof(struct mem_cgroup);
+ size += nr_node_ids * sizeof(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *);
+ memcg = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!memcg)
return NULL;
@@ -6157,10 +6148,7 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(void)
return memcg;
out_free:
- if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
- kfree(memcg);
- else
- vfree(memcg);
+ kfree(memcg);
return NULL;
}
@@ -6178,7 +6166,6 @@ out_free:
static void __mem_cgroup_free(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
int node;
- size_t size = memcg_size();
mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(memcg);
@@ -6199,10 +6186,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_free(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
* the cgroup_lock.
*/
disarm_static_keys(memcg);
- if (size < PAGE_SIZE)
- kfree(memcg);
- else
- vfree(memcg);
+ kfree(memcg);
}
/*
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists