lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131214003208.f99bc37c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 14 Dec 2013 00:32:08 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: vunmap() on large regions may trigger soft lockup warnings

On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:50:47 +0000 David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com> wrote:

> > each time.  But that would require difficult tuning of N.
> > 
> > I suppose we could just do
> > 
> > 	if (!in_interrupt())
> > 		cond_resched();
> > 
> > in vunmap_pmd_range(), but that's pretty specific to ghes.c and doesn't
> > permit unmap-inside-spinlock.
> > 
> > So I can't immediately think of a suitable fix apart from adding a new
> > unmap_kernel_range_atomic().  Then add a `bool atomic' arg to
> > vunmap_page_range() and pass that all the way down.
> 
> That would work for the unmap, but looking at the GHES driver some more
> and it looks like it's call to ioremap_page_range() is already unsafe --
> it may need to allocate a new PTE page with a non-atomic alloc in
> pte_alloc_one_kernel().
> 
> Perhaps what's needed here is a pair of ioremap_page_atomic() and
> iounmap_page_atomic() calls?  With some prep function to sure the PTE
> pages (etc.) are preallocated.

Is ghes.c the only problem source here?  If so then a suitable solution
would be to declare that driver hopelessly busted and proceed as if it
didn't exist :(

Just from a quick look, the thing is doing ioremap() from NMI context! 
ioremap has to do a bunch of memory allocations, takes spinlocks etc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ