[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131214.222658.766340465002992773.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:26:58 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rashika.kheria@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sebastian@...akpoint.cc,
sachin.kamat@...aro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
josh@...htriplett.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] drivers: net: Put prototype declaration for
function sbni_probe() in sbni.c
From: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 17:55:42 +0530
> This patch declares the prototype for the function sbni_probe() in file sbni.c.
>
> Thus, it also removes the following warning in wan/sbni.c:
> drivers/net/wan/sbni.c:224:12: warning: no previous prototype for ‘sbni_probe’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
> ---
>
> This revision fixes the following issues of the previous revision:
> Incorrect fix
>
> drivers/net/wan/sbni.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/sbni.c b/drivers/net/wan/sbni.c
> index 388ddf6..5061ffd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wan/sbni.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/sbni.c
> @@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ static void __init sbni_devsetup(struct net_device *dev)
> dev->netdev_ops = &sbni_netdev_ops;
> }
>
> +int __init sbni_probe(int unit);
> int __init sbni_probe(int unit)
This is not the correct way to fix this kind of warning, an exported
function needs to appear in a header file so that both the definition
and any callers of this function will see the same declaration in that
header file.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists