[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52AD8D6D.6090303@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:07:25 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] arm64, jump label: optimize jump label implementation
On 12/13/2013 11:52 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:50:23 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:41:04 +0000
>> Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
>>
>>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/jump_label.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/insn.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
>>>
>>> Slightly worrying... this should be CONFIG_HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, right? How did
>>> you manage to test this code?
>>
>> In <linux/jump_label.h> we have:
>>
>> #if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> # include <asm/jump_label.h>
>
> This also makes the include of <asm/jump_label.h> in the C file
> redundant.
>
> -- Steve
Thanks, Steve.
Will remove the redundant include header file.
>
>> # define HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
>> #endif /* CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO && CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL */
>>
>>
>> -- Steve
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists