lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 15 Dec 2013 04:42:50 -0800 (PST)
From:	John <da_audiophile@...oo.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"david.heidelberger@...t.cz" <david.heidelberger@...t.cz>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] expand micro-optimizations in kernel to newer model CPUs





----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Weinberger <>
>
> A *very* small speedup.
> 
> And I really doubt your numbers.
> Why are you using ANOVA? You're comparing *two* groups not more than two.
> I had a quick look at your raw numbers, they don't seem to be normally
> distributed at all.
> Did you remove some peaks?
> 


Hi Richard.  Thank you for your interest.  Yes, a small speedup as I mentioned but  I'll note that the current kernel code includes the MCORE2 option.  I tested this against some of the newer ones and they are all on par with each other.  For example, here are differences in median values:

CPUDifference in median value
core2        +87.5 ms
core7-avx+79.7 ms
core-avx-i+257.2 ms

I am using ANOVA to establish that the generic group differs from the optimized group.  I have always used ANOVA for this sort of comparison whether using two or more groups.  In fact, thumb through any medical or scientific journal, you'll see others in pier reviewed article doing the same.  

I did not remove any datapoints; I do not understand why you don't think the sets are normally distributed.  Did you see the normal quantile plots?  Additionally, the population variances are fairly equal (Levene and Barlett tests). 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ