| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuJSe_BZ+cr8ZVz-etAzsUbe_taS+0EqM+pXhKhTdyuWiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:29:00 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
prabhakar.csengg@...il.com,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for Keystone SoC
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.strashko@...com> wrote:
> The similar GPIO HW block is used by keystone SoCs as
> in Davinci SoCs.
> Hence, reuse Davinci GPIO driver for Keystone taking into
> account that Keystone contains ARM GIC IRQ controller which
> is implemented using IRQ Chip.
>
> Documentation:
> http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf
>
> CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> CC: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
> CC: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
> CC: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt | 4 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 49 +++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt
> index a2e839d..4ce9862 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> -Davinci GPIO controller bindings
> +Davinci/Keystone GPIO controller bindings
>
> Required Properties:
> -- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio"
> +- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio", "ti,keystone-gpio"
>
> - reg: Physical base address of the controller and the size of memory mapped
> registers.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index 73f65ca..3e44e0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -413,6 +413,27 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops davinci_gpio_irq_ops = {
> .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell,
> };
>
> +static struct irq_chip *davinci_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + static struct irq_chip_type gpio_unbanked;
> +
> + gpio_unbanked = *container_of(irq_get_chip(irq),
> + struct irq_chip_type, chip);
> +
> + return &gpio_unbanked.chip;
> +};
> +
> +static struct irq_chip *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + static struct irq_chip gpio_unbanked;
> +
> + gpio_unbanked = *irq_get_chip(irq);
> + pr_err("keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip\n");
Do you intend this pr_err() to remain here?
> + return &gpio_unbanked;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id davinci_gpio_ids[];
> +
> /*
> * NOTE: for suspend/resume, probably best to make a platform_device with
> * suspend_late/resume_resume calls hooking into results of the set_wake()
> @@ -433,6 +454,15 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
> struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g;
> struct irq_domain *irq_domain = NULL;
> + const struct of_device_id *match;
> + struct irq_chip *irq_chip;
> + struct irq_chip *(*gpio_get_irq_chip)(unsigned int irq);
> +
> + gpio_get_irq_chip = davinci_gpio_get_irq_chip;
> + match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(davinci_gpio_ids),
> + dev);
> + if (match)
> + gpio_get_irq_chip = match->data;
>
> ngpio = pdata->ngpio;
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> @@ -442,7 +472,6 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> bank_irq = res->start;
> -
> if (!bank_irq) {
> dev_err(dev, "Invalid IRQ resource\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -484,25 +513,22 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> /*
> - * AINTC can handle direct/unbanked IRQs for GPIOs, with the GPIO
> + * INTC can handle direct/unbanked IRQs for GPIOs, with the GPIO
> * controller only handling trigger modes. We currently assume no
> * IRQ mux conflicts; gpio_irq_type_unbanked() is only for GPIOs.
> */
> if (pdata->gpio_unbanked) {
> - static struct irq_chip_type gpio_unbanked;
> -
> /* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */
> chips[0].chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked;
> chips[0].gpio_irq = bank_irq;
> chips[0].gpio_unbanked = pdata->gpio_unbanked;
> binten = BIT(0);
>
> - /* AINTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */
> + /* INTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */
> irq = bank_irq;
> - gpio_unbanked = *container_of(irq_get_chip(irq),
> - struct irq_chip_type, chip);
> - gpio_unbanked.chip.name = "GPIO-AINTC";
> - gpio_unbanked.chip.irq_set_type = gpio_irq_type_unbanked;
> + irq_chip = gpio_get_irq_chip(irq);
> + irq_chip->name = "GPIO-AINTC";
According to the other renamings I see in this file, shouldn't the
string also be changed to "GPIO-INTC"?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists