[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52AEB8D5.8020705@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:24:53 +0800
From: Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@...wei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] romfs: remove an redundant if condition in romfs_readpage
On 2013/12/16 16:10, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:39:09 +0800 Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> Here ret always equals 0, so SetPageUptodate directly.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/fs/romfs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/romfs/super.c
>> @@ -129,8 +129,7 @@ static int romfs_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page)
>>
>> if (fillsize < PAGE_SIZE)
>> memset(buf + fillsize, 0, PAGE_SIZE - fillsize);
>> - if (ret == 0)
>> - SetPageUptodate(page);
>> + SetPageUptodate(page);
>>
>> flush_dcache_page(page);
>> kunmap(page);
>
> Nope, `ret' can be -EIO:
>
> ret = 0;
> if (offset < size) {
> size -= offset;
> fillsize = size > PAGE_SIZE ? PAGE_SIZE : size;
>
> pos = ROMFS_I(inode)->i_dataoffset + offset;
>
> ret = romfs_dev_read(inode->i_sb, pos, buf, fillsize);
> if (ret < 0) {
> SetPageError(page);
> fillsize = 0;
> -->> ret = -EIO;
> }
> }
>
> if (fillsize < PAGE_SIZE)
> memset(buf + fillsize, 0, PAGE_SIZE - fillsize);
> if (ret == 0)
> SetPageUptodate(page);
>
>
> It was a bit rude to overwrite the romfs_dev_read() return code though.
>
Ah, my fault. Ignore that, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists