linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Use postcore_initcall(regulator_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131216084050.GA30671@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date:	Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:40:52 +0800
From:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Use
 postcore_initcall(regulator_init_complete)

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 03:03:00PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > What is going on about that patch?
> 
> Mark fixed the problem with the following commits:

Thanks for the info, Fabio.

Shawn

> 
> commit 75bc9641cadd2a3f91f9c2e7f2fdfdeb8bd4b1d6
> Author: Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
> Date:   Wed Nov 27 16:22:53 2013 +0000
> 
>     regulator: core: Check for DT every time we check full constraints
> 
>     Eliminate the gap between DT becoming available and this being used to say
>     we have full constraints by checking directly for DT every time we check
>     for full constraints. This improves interoperaton with optional regulator
>     support.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
>     Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
> 
> commit 87b2841753e1694fc96fefb467f6aff9940b07af
> Author: Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
> Date:   Wed Nov 27 16:13:10 2013 +0000
> 
>     regulator: core: Replace checks of have_full_constraints with a function
> 
>     Simple code reorganisation so we can change the logic for deciding what
>     full constraints are more easily.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...aro.org>
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Fabio Estevam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/