[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52AEBF36.9010400@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:22:06 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, "balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>
CC: Belisko Marek <marek.belisko@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap: twl-common: Fix musb-hdrc device name.
Hi,
On Friday 13 December 2013 11:06 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> [131213 03:57]:
>> On Friday 13 December 2013 04:57 PM, Belisko Marek wrote:
>>> Kishon can you please comment on that? Would be possible to get your
>>> patch to 3.13 (I seen some comments from Felipe).
>>
>> I'm not sure as my patch modifies all the board files. There was initially some
>> confusion w.r.t when the board files will be dropped. But since board files
>> will still be there in 3.13, I'd recommend my patch [1] to be taken. Anyways
>> if you have tested my patch (series), pls give your Tested-by.
>>
>> Tony, summary of the issue..
>> After the platform devices are created using PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, the
>> device names given in usb_bind_phy (in board file) does not match with
>> the actual device name causing the USB PHY library not to return the
>> PHY reference when the MUSB controller request for the PHY in the non-dt boot
>> case. So removed creating platform devices using PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO in
>> omap2430.c. So had to make the corresponding changes in board files.
>
> OK. Can you please repost with a proper commit id for what caused the
> regression and summararize why it should be fixed this way. Something like:
>
> Commit abcd1234 (usb: blah foo bar) caused blah blah blah. Fix the issue
> with blah blah blah. Note that the board-*.c files will be removed soon,
> but for v3.13 we still support both legacy booting and device tree based
> booting and need to fix it.
huh.. I think we can have a much simpler fix. All this binding in board file
was introduced to support platforms that has multiple PHYs of the same type.
But musb/omap2430.c serves platforms that has only one PHY of a particular
type. We can just go back to usb_get_phy(enum usb_phy_type type) instead of
'usb_get_phy_dev' in omap2430.c. Felipe, what do you think?
Cheers
Kishon
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>
>> [1] -> http://lists.scusting.com/index.php?t=msg&th=375579&start=0&S=Google
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists