[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131216015049.GB3754@dhcp-16-126.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:50:50 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org, hpa@...or.com,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, horms@...ge.net.au,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, bp@...en8.de, greg@...ah.com,
toshi.kani@...com, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/14] efi: use early_memremap and early_memunmap
On 12/13/13 at 04:51pm, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:17:58AM -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> > Anyway, I posted a patch to create a generic early_ioremap
> > implementation using generic bits of the x86 code:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/27/621
> >
> > So maybe Dave's patch 1/14 should be part of that series or
> > get rebased on top of it.
>
> Yes, having those two sets of changes to the same bits floating around
> at the same time is painful.
> If you could integrate those changes into your set, everyone wins.
I have no idea how to handle these dependency problems between different
patchset, but for this one I feel it's better to add it to Mark's series,
what's the status of the series, has it been reviewed and ready for merge?
--
Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists