[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131216114510.GE3185@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:45:10 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:08:34AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> I sent a fix for this already on last Wednesday but I forgot to put you
> on as recipient.
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1612360
> Fix is needed also for clock driver and on Saturday Rashika Kheria
> posted similar patch.
I've now applied your patch (which fixes both regulator and clocks, the
separate patch isn't needed). The big question I have is how this
managed to get into Linus' tree - why didn't this show up in -next?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists