[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVMPQUjAmvNpO+WVLDzVBwkwPtqqyBga_uXxfptVpEPPbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 21:24:40 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...elcunningham.com.au>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, tomaz.solc@...lix.org,
aaron.lu@...el.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata, freezer: avoid block device removal while system
is frozen
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:12:07PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Looks we should guarantee that I/O queue is emptied before system sleep,
>> otherwise it may be a bug, since battery may be drained up to cause
>> data loss or block devices may be disconnected during sleep.
>
> It's a bit beside the point as that's what journaling is for. Power
> loss during suspend isn't all that different from power loss while
> suspended. Also, the filesystems are already synced before entering
> suspend, so it shouldn't be an issue. However, that doesn't guarantee
> there aren't no pending bdi work items. We *hope* to control the
You mean there are still some write I/O scheduled after processes are
frozen? by unfreezable kernel threads?
> sources with freezer but there's no guarantee about the coverage and
> no way to verify that either.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists