[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1387205130.2797.4.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 06:45:30 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net,
mingo@...hat.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jason.low2@...com, Waiman.Long@...com,
scott.norton@...com, aswin@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf-bench: add futex-wake microbenchmark
On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 14:25 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Davidlohr,
>
> On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:31:56 -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > Block a bunch of threads on a futex and wake them up, N at a time.
> >
> > This program is particularly useful to measure the latency of nthread wakeups
> > in non-error situations: all waiters are queued and all wake calls wakeup
> > one or more tasks. An example run:
> >
> > $ perf bench futex -t 512 -r 100
>
> Did you mean 'perf bench futex wake'?
Yes I did.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists