[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMwXhPLU_2MUkJXgz-ab062bBjtcOEsvwNCSj0vG0eg9sr=rQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:13:47 +0000
From: Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: (max8997) Handle the potential error for mfd_add_devices
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Richard Weinberger
<richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Laszlo Papp <lpapp@....org> wrote:
>>>> > The $SUBJECT line is wrong. To see how a subsystem usually formats
>>>> > theirs you must do something like `git log --oneline -- <subsystem>`.
>>>> > And duplicate the format.
>>>> >
>>>> > Commit message?
>>>
>>> These comments are still relevant, please re-post your patch with the
>>> points rectified.
>>
>> I really do not understand how they relevant. "Commit message?" ->
>> What about it? It has a pretty clear commit message. Are you now just
>> picking nits about "foo:" vs "(foo)" in the short line?
>
> The commit message needs to have subject and a body.
Why? What advantage does that have in very simple cases like this?
> A good message body explains what the current situation is, why it is
> broken/has problems
> and how this patch fixes that.
The current commit message explains that in my opinion. Please bring
up real issues with it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists