[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9BBC4E0CF881AA4299206E2E1412B6264FA14396@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:51:45 +0000
From: "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
CC: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
"Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
"Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"Dave, Tushar N" <tushar.n.dave@...el.com>,
"Abodunrin, Akeem G" <akeem.g.abodunrin@...el.com>,
"Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com>,
"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/9] drivers: net: Remove unused function
igb_get_eee_status_i354() in e1000_82575.c
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Triplett [mailto:josh@...htriplett.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 10:22 AM
> To: Wyborny, Carolyn
> Cc: Rashika Kheria; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg,
> Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr,
> Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John; Dave, Tushar N; Abodunrin, Akeem
> G; Vick, Matthew; e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] drivers: net: Remove unused function
> igb_get_eee_status_i354() in e1000_82575.c
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 06:17:40PM +0000, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Josh Triplett [mailto:josh@...htriplett.org]
> > > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 9:43 AM
> > > To: Wyborny, Carolyn
> > > Cc: Rashika Kheria; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Kirsher, Jeffrey
> > > T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose,
> > > Gregory V; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak,
> > > John; Dave, Tushar N; Abodunrin, Akeem G; Vick, Matthew;
> > > e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] drivers: net: Remove unused function
> > > igb_get_eee_status_i354() in e1000_82575.c
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 05:11:25PM +0000, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Rashika Kheria [mailto:rashika.kheria@...il.com]
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 4:15 AM
> > > > > To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > Cc: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W;
> > > > > Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V;
> > > > > Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; Duyck, Alexander H; Ronciak, John; Dave,
> > > > > Tushar N; Abodunrin, Akeem G; Vick, Matthew; e1000-
> > > > > devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> > > > > josh@...htriplett.org
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/9] drivers: net: Remove unused function
> > > > > igb_get_eee_status_i354() in e1000_82575.c
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch removes the function igb_get_eee_status_i354() in
> > > > > e1000_82575.c because it is unused.
> > > > >
> > > > > It thus eliminates the following warning in
> > > > > ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c:
> > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c:2591:5: warning: no
> > > > > previous prototype for ‘igb_get_eee_status_i354’
> > > > > [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c | 32 ------------------------
> --
> > > > > 1 file changed, 32 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c
> > > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c
> > > > > index 47c2d10..18e5200 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c
> > > > > @@ -2580,38 +2580,6 @@ out:
> > > > > return ret_val;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > -/**
> > > > > - * igb_get_eee_status_i354 - Get EEE status
> > > > > - * @hw: pointer to the HW structure
> > > > > - * @status: EEE status
> > > > > - *
> > > > > - * Get EEE status by guessing based on whether Tx or Rx LPI
> > > > > indications have
> > > > > - * been received.
> > > > > - **/
> > > > > -s32 igb_get_eee_status_i354(struct e1000_hw *hw, bool *status) -{
> > > > > - struct e1000_phy_info *phy = &hw->phy;
> > > > > - s32 ret_val = 0;
> > > > > - u16 phy_data;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - /* Check if EEE is supported on this device. */
> > > > > - if ((hw->phy.media_type != e1000_media_type_copper) ||
> > > > > - (phy->id != M88E1543_E_PHY_ID))
> > > > > - goto out;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - ret_val = igb_read_xmdio_reg(hw, E1000_PCS_STATUS_ADDR_I354,
> > > > > - E1000_PCS_STATUS_DEV_I354,
> > > > > - &phy_data);
> > > > > - if (ret_val)
> > > > > - goto out;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - *status = phy_data & (E1000_PCS_STATUS_TX_LPI_RCVD |
> > > > > - E1000_PCS_STATUS_RX_LPI_RCVD) ? true : false;
> > > > > -
> > > > > -out:
> > > > > - return ret_val;
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -
> > > > > static const u8 e1000_emc_temp_data[4] = {
> > > > > E1000_EMC_INTERNAL_DATA,
> > > > > E1000_EMC_DIODE1_DATA,
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.7.9.5
> > > >
> > > > NACK.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the patch Rashika, but this is the incorrect fix for
> > > > this warning The function is called in the igb_probe function, so
> > > > you cannot remove it and I see the prototype in the e1000_82575.h file.
> > > > Can you double check your source pull?
> > >
> > > From top-of-tree linux.git:
> > >
> > > ~/src/linux$ git grep igb_get_eee_status_i354
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c: *
> > > igb_get_eee_status_i354 - Get EEE status
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_82575.c:s32jjj
> > > igb_get_eee_status_i354(struct e1000_hw *hw, bool *status)
> > >
> > > A comment and the function itself; no other references. In what
> > > tree are you seeing a reference to igb_get_eee_status_i354?
> > >
> > > - Josh Triplett
> >
> > Thanks Josh,
> >
> > My mistake. I was looking at the "get" not "set" function. However, this is still
> not the right fix for the driver as the actual problem is the missing code that is
> supposed to be calling that function in igb_get_eee in igb_ethtool.c. The
> function needs to stay. I will submit the correct fix ASAP.
>
> Ah, that makes sense. Can you please Cc Rashika and myself on that patch, with
> a Reported-by for Rashika?
>
> - Josh Triplett
Of course. I'll add a Reported-by for you as well.
Thanks,
Carolyn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists