linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] xen-netback: Timeout packets in RX path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:03:06 +0000
From:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
CC:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] xen-netback: Timeout packets in RX path

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 05:16:17PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> On 13/12/13 15:44, Wei Liu wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:48:16PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> >>A malicious or buggy guest can leave its queue filled indefinitely, in which
> >>case qdisc start to queue packets for that VIF. If those packets came from an
> >>another guest, it can block its slots and prevent shutdown. To avoid that, we
> >>make sure the queue is drained in every 10 seconds
> >>
> >
> >Oh I see where the 10 second constraint in previous patch comes from.
> >
> >Could you define a macro for this constant then use it everywhere.
> Well, they are not entirely the same thing, but worth making them
> the same. How about using "unmap_timeout >
> (rx_drain_timeout_msecs/1000)" in xenvif_free()? Then netback won't
> complain about a stucked page if an another guest is permitted to
> hold on to it.
> 

Thanks for clarification. I see the difference. If they are not the same
by definition then we need to think more about making them the same in
practice.

If we use  "unmap_timeout > (rx_drain_timeout_msecs/1000)" then we
basically assume that guest RX path is the one who is most likely to
hold the packet for the longest time.

Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/