lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:32:08 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] SubmittingPatches: Document the use of git

On 12/16/13 11:30, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 12/15/13 12:59, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> Most of the mechanical portions of SubmittingPatches exist to help patch
>> submitters replicate the output of git.  Mention this explicitly, both
>> as a reminder that git will help with this process, and as signposting to
>> let git users know what they can safely skip.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
>> index 53e6590..fdad7d1 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
>> +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
>> @@ -14,7 +14,10 @@ Read Documentation/SubmitChecklist for a list of items to check
>>  before submitting code.  If you are submitting a driver, also read
>>  Documentation/SubmittingDrivers.
>>  
>> -
>> +Many of these steps describe the default behavior of the git version
>> +control system; if you use git to prepare your patches, you'll find much
>> +of the mechanical work done for you, though you'll still need to prepare
>> +and document a sensible set of patches.
>>  
>>  --------------------------------------------
>>  SECTION 1 - CREATING AND SENDING YOUR CHANGE
>> @@ -25,7 +28,9 @@ SECTION 1 - CREATING AND SENDING YOUR CHANGE
>>  1) "diff -up"
>>  ------------
>>  
>> -Use "diff -up" or "diff -uprN" to create patches.
>> +Use "diff -up" or "diff -uprN" to create patches.  git generates patches
>> +in this form by default; if you're using git, you can skip this section
>> +entirely.
>>  
>>  All changes to the Linux kernel occur in the form of patches, as
>>  generated by diff(1).  When creating your patch, make sure to create it
>> @@ -66,19 +71,14 @@ Make sure your patch does not include any extra files which do not
>>  belong in a patch submission.  Make sure to review your patch -after-
>>  generated it with diff(1), to ensure accuracy.
>>  
>> -If your changes produce a lot of deltas, you may want to look into
>> -splitting them into individual patches which modify things in
>> -logical stages.  This will facilitate easier reviewing by other
>> -kernel developers, very important if you want your patch accepted.
>> -There are a number of scripts which can aid in this:
>> -
> 
> I object to the removal of the quilt reference.  git is overkill for
> simple patches.

bah humbug.  Sorry, I missed the movement of the quilt reference.


>> -Quilt:
>> -http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/quilt
>> +If your changes produce a lot of deltas, you need to split them into
>> +individual patches which modify things in logical stages; see section
>> +#3.  This will facilitate easier reviewing by other kernel developers,
>> +very important if you want your patch accepted.
>>  
>> -Andrew Morton's patch scripts:
>> -http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/patch-scripts.tar.gz
>> -Instead of these scripts, quilt is the recommended patch management
>> -tool (see above).
>> +If you're using git, "git rebase -i" can help you with this process.  If
>> +you're not using git, quilt <http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/quilt>
>> +is another popular alternative.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> @@ -607,7 +607,8 @@ patch.
>>  If you are going to include a diffstat after the "---" marker, please
>>  use diffstat options "-p 1 -w 70" so that filenames are listed from
>>  the top of the kernel source tree and don't use too much horizontal
>> -space (easily fit in 80 columns, maybe with some indentation).
>> +space (easily fit in 80 columns, maybe with some indentation).  (git
>> +generates appropriate diffstats by default.)
>>  
>>  See more details on the proper patch format in the following
>>  references.
>>
> 
> 


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists