| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1387222829.2156.51.camel@dcbw.foobar.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:40:29 -0600
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To: "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@...ion.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Belisko Marek <marek.belisko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hso: fix problem with wrong status code sent by
OPTION GTM601 during RING indication
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 15:43 +0100, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 02.10.2013 um 09:00 schrieb Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller:
>
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > we are using a GTM601 modem (Firmware 1.7) for a while and have spotted an
> > issue that under some conditions the modem sends a packed wIndex over USB
> > that is rejected by the hso driver making troubles afterwards. Not rejecting makes
> > it work fine.
> >
> > BR,
> > Nikolaus Schaller
> >
> > ---
> >
> > From f5c7e15b61f2ce4fe3105ff914f6bfaf5d74af0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
> > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:40:57 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] hso: fix problem with wrong status code sent by OPTION
> > GTM601 during RING indication
> >
> > It has been observed that the GTM601 with 1.7 firmware sometimes sends a value
> > wIndex that has bit 0x04 set instead of being reset as the code expects. So we
> > mask it for the error check.
> >
> > See http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail/gta04-owner/2012-February/001643.html
> >
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
> > Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.de>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/usb/hso.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> > index cba1d46..d146e26 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> > @@ -1503,7 +1503,8 @@ static void tiocmget_intr_callback(struct urb *urb)
> > if (serial_state_notification->bmRequestType != BM_REQUEST_TYPE ||
> > serial_state_notification->bNotification != B_NOTIFICATION ||
> > le16_to_cpu(serial_state_notification->wValue) != W_VALUE ||
> > - le16_to_cpu(serial_state_notification->wIndex) != W_INDEX ||
> > + (le16_to_cpu(serial_state_notification->wIndex) & ~0x4) !=
> > + W_INDEX ||
> > le16_to_cpu(serial_state_notification->wLength) != W_LENGTH) {
> > dev_warn(&usb->dev,
> > "hso received invalid serial state notification\n");
> > --
> > 1.7.7.4
> >
> >
>
> I have found this (better) proposal by OPTION, but wonder what did happen to it.
> It neither shows in mainline 3.13-rc nor linux-next:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/9/263
Likely because nobody formally submitted the patch with a signed-off-by,
which indicates their intent that the patch is tested, correct, and can
be merged to the kernel.
I looked at this today, and I'm left wondering how any port other than
HSO_PORT_MODEM can get the notification via tiocmget_intr_callback().
"serial->tiocmget" is only created for HSO_PORT_MODEM serial ports (see
hso_create_bulk_serial_device()):
if ((port & HSO_PORT_MASK) == HSO_PORT_MODEM) {
num_urbs = 2;
serial->tiocmget = kzalloc(sizeof(struct hso_tiocmget),
GFP_KERNEL);
and the code in tiocmget_intr_callback() does this:
tiocmget = serial->tiocmget;
if (!tiocmget)
return;
which should mean that only a HSO_PORT_MODEM will ever process the
notification. Further, the tiocmget interrupt URB is only created and
submitted if serial->tiocmget != NULL, so only HSO_PORT_MODEM should
ever be calling into tiocmget_intr_callback().
So I think Eric's patch is actually wrong because it will *always* pass
the new check.
The original code had the correct intention, but the original code was
obviously wrong for newer devices where the port layout is read from
firmware and not from static tables, and thus for recent devices where
the modem interface is not USB interface #2.
Can you confirm/deny that the 'modem' interface for your GTM601 is USB
interface #6? For example, my Icon 452 has the following USB interface
layout:
0: Diag
1: GPS
2: GPS control
3: Application
4: Control
5: Network
6: Modem
So like the GTM601, I would expect any RING notifications to appear for
wIndex=0x06.
Does the following patch fix the problem for you?
Dan
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
index 86292e6..1c7bdeb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
+++ b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
@@ -181,15 +181,14 @@ enum rx_ctrl_state{
RX_SENT,
RX_PENDING
};
#define BM_REQUEST_TYPE (0xa1)
#define B_NOTIFICATION (0x20)
#define W_VALUE (0x0)
-#define W_INDEX (0x2)
#define W_LENGTH (0x2)
#define B_OVERRUN (0x1<<6)
#define B_PARITY (0x1<<5)
#define B_FRAMING (0x1<<4)
#define B_RING_SIGNAL (0x1<<3)
#define B_BREAK (0x1<<2)
@@ -1483,31 +1482,38 @@ static void tiocmget_intr_callback(struct urb *urb)
struct hso_serial *serial = urb->context;
struct hso_tiocmget *tiocmget;
int status = urb->status;
u16 UART_state_bitmap, prev_UART_state_bitmap;
struct uart_icount *icount;
struct hso_serial_state_notification *serial_state_notification;
struct usb_device *usb;
+ int if_num;
/* Sanity checks */
if (!serial)
return;
if (status) {
handle_usb_error(status, __func__, serial->parent);
return;
}
+
+ /* tiocmget is only supported on HSO_PORT_MODEM */
tiocmget = serial->tiocmget;
if (!tiocmget)
return;
+ BUG_ON((serial->parent->port_spec & HSO_PORT_MASK) != HSO_PORT_MODEM);
+
usb = serial->parent->usb;
+ if_num = serial->parent->interface->altsetting->desc.bInterfaceNumber;
+
serial_state_notification = &tiocmget->serial_state_notification;
if (serial_state_notification->bmRequestType != BM_REQUEST_TYPE ||
serial_state_notification->bNotification != B_NOTIFICATION ||
le16_to_cpu(serial_state_notification->wValue) != W_VALUE ||
- le16_to_cpu(serial_state_notification->wIndex) != W_INDEX ||
+ le16_to_cpu(serial_state_notification->wIndex) != if_num ||
le16_to_cpu(serial_state_notification->wLength) != W_LENGTH) {
dev_warn(&usb->dev,
"hso received invalid serial state notification\n");
DUMP(serial_state_notification,
sizeof(struct hso_serial_state_notification));
} else {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists