lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:14:02 -0800
From:	Mike Turquette <>
To:	Alex Elder <>
Cc:	Christian Daudt <>,
	Ian Campbell <>,
	Mark Rutland <>,
	Pawel Moll <>,
	Rob Herring <>,
	Rob Landley <>,
	Russell King <>,
	Stephen Warren <>,
	Tim Kryger <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	LKML <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] clk: bcm281xx: add initial clock framework support

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Alex Elder <> wrote:
> In the mean time, I have created a new branch that
> is based on v3.13-rc4 (and includes Tim's prerequisite
> patches).  Pull request (still wrapped my my mailer)
> is below.

Hi Alex,

This isn't a mess but is pretty normal. Can you create a new branch
with only your 2 clock patches applied on top of my clk-next branch?
You should merge "ARM: dts: bcm281xx: define real clocks" through the
arm-soc tree. Then you can send another pull request to me which has
just the 2 bcm clock patches based on clk-next and everything will
eventually end up linux-next all together.

Just FYI if I took your pull request as-is then the clk-next tree
would become polluted with lots of extra bcm patches.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists