lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201312171135.38576@blacky.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:35:37 +0400
From:	Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@....rtsoft.ru>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexey Lugovskoy <lugovskoy@....rtsoft.ru>,
	Dmitry Krivoschekov <dkrivoschokov@....rtsoft.ru>
Subject: commit e38c0a1f breaks powerpc boards with uli1575 chip

Hi

While trying to make freescale p2020ds and  mpc8572ds boards working with mainline kernel, I faced that commit 
e38c0a1f (Handle #address-cells > 2 specially) breaks things with these boards.

Both these boards have uli1575 chip.
Corresponding part in device tree is something like

                uli1575@0 {
                        reg = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
                        #size-cells = <2>;
                        #address-cells = <3>;
                        ranges = <0x2000000 0x0 0x80000000
                                  0x2000000 0x0 0x80000000
                                  0x0 0x20000000

                                  0x1000000 0x0 0x0
                                  0x1000000 0x0 0x0
                                  0x0 0x10000>;
                        isa@1e {
...

I.e. it has #address-cells = <3>


With commit e38c0a1f reverted, devices under uli1575 are registered correctly, e.g. for rtc

OF: ** translation for device /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@...sa@...rtc@70 **
OF: bus is isa (na=2, ns=1) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@...sa@1e
OF: translating address: 00000001 00000070
OF: parent bus is default (na=3, ns=2) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@0
OF: walking ranges...
OF: ISA map, cp=0, s=1000, da=70
OF: parent translation for: 01000000 00000000 00000000
OF: with offset: 70
OF: one level translation: 00000000 00000000 00000070
OF: parent bus is pci (na=3, ns=2) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@0
OF: walking ranges...
OF: default map, cp=a0000000, s=20000000, da=70
OF: default map, cp=0, s=10000, da=70
OF: parent translation for: 01000000 00000000 00000000
OF: with offset: 70
OF: one level translation: 01000000 00000000 00000070
OF: parent bus is pci (na=3, ns=2) on /pcie@...09000
OF: walking ranges...
OF: PCI map, cp=0, s=10000, da=70
OF: parent translation for: 01000000 00000000 00000000
OF: with offset: 70
OF: one level translation: 01000000 00000000 00000070
OF: parent bus is default (na=2, ns=2) on /
OF: walking ranges...
OF: PCI map, cp=0, s=10000, da=70
OF: parent translation for: 00000000 ffc10000
OF: with offset: 70
OF: one level translation: 00000000 ffc10070
OF: reached root node

With commit e38c0a1f in place, address translation fails:

OF: ** translation for device /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@...sa@...rtc@70 **
OF: bus is isa (na=2, ns=1) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@...sa@1e
OF: translating address: 00000001 00000070
OF: parent bus is default (na=3, ns=2) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@...li1575@0
OF: walking ranges...
OF: ISA map, cp=0, s=1000, da=70
OF: parent translation for: 01000000 00000000 00000000
OF: with offset: 70
OF: one level translation: 00000000 00000000 00000070
OF: parent bus is pci (na=3, ns=2) on /pcie@...09000/pcie@0
OF: walking ranges...
OF: default map, cp=a0000000, s=20000000, da=70
OF: default map, cp=0, s=10000, da=70
OF: not found !

Either e38c0a1f should be reverted, or uli1575 (and perhaps other similar devices) have to be described in device 
trees differently.

Could someone please comment on this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ