[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131217103242.GB19810@lee--X1>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:32:42 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] mfd: menelaus: Start to use irqdomain
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Introduce an irq_chip and irq_domain for menelaus driver. Following
> patches will convert uses to traditional request_threaded_irq().
>
> While at that, some better error handling had to be added, so we could
> free irq descs we allocated.
>
> Tested-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/menelaus.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
<snip>
> +static void menelaus_irq_ack(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct menelaus_chip *m = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> + int irq = data->irq - m->irq_base;
Shoudn't this now be?
int irq = data->hwirq;
> + if (irq > 7) {
> + m->ack2 |= BIT(irq);
> + m->ack2_pending = true;
> + } else {
> + m->ack1 |= BIT(irq);
> + m->ack1_pending = true;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void menelaus_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct menelaus_chip *m = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> + int irq = data->irq - m->irq_base;
Same for here, and all the others.
<snip>
> + irq_domain_add_legacy(node, MENELAUS_NR_IRQS, irq_base, 0,
> + &irq_domain_simple_ops, m);
Please use irq_domain_add_simple() here.
> + m->irq_base = irq_base;
I don't think you need this.
> + for (i = irq_base; i < irq_base + MENELAUS_NR_IRQS; i++) {
> + irq_set_chip_data(i, m);
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &menelaus_irq_chip,
> + handle_simple_irq);
> + irq_set_nested_thread(i, 1);
> + set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID);
> + }
You should put this in the .map() operation and the reverse in .unmap().
> fail:
> + irq_free_descs(irq_base, MENELAUS_NR_IRQS);
I don't think you need to do this.
>
> static int menelaus_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> + struct menelaus_chip *m = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> + irq_free_descs(m->irq_base, MENELAUS_NR_IRQS);
Nor here.
> the_menelaus = NULL;
Shouldn't this have been removed in patch 6?
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists