[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52B03C84.1000600@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 19:59:00 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux-X86 <x86@...nel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: mm: Change tlb_flushall_shift for IvyBridge
On 12/16/2013 09:59 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So if the kbuild speedup of 1-2% is true and reproducable then that
> might be worth doing.
I have a Intel desktop and need it for daily works. Wonder if Intel guys
like to have a try? I assume the patch is already in Fengguang's testing
system.
>
> Building the kernel is obviously a prime workload - and given that the
> kernel is active only about 10% of the time for a typical kernel
> build, a 1-2% speedup means a 10-20% speedup in kernel performance
> (which sounds a bit too good at first glance).
Maybe a extra time tlb flush causes more tlb refill that cost much user
space time.
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists