[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131217122720.950475833@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:27:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it, juri.lelli@...il.com,
nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it, luca.abeni@...tn.it,
dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
insop.song@...il.com, liming.wang@...driver.com, jkacur@...hat.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 00/13] sched, deadline: patches
Hai..
This is my current queue of SCHED_DEADLINE; which I hope to merge 'soon'.
Juri handed me a version that should've (didn't check) included all feedback
including the new sched_attr interface.
I did clean up some of the patches; moved some hunks around so that each patch
compiles on its own etc..
I then did a number of patches at the end to change some actual stuff around.
Juri do you have some userspace around to test with? I'm just too likely to
have wrecked everything; so if you don't have something I need to go write
something before merging this :-)
No need to update your test proglets to the new interface, I can lift it if
that is more convenient -- I know you're conferencing atm.
One question; the SoB chain in patch 2/13 seems weird; I suppose that
patch is a collaborative effort? could we cure that by mentioning Fabio
and Michael in some other way?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists