[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131217135156.GC3145@console-pimps.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:51:56 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Linux EFI <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] efi: Make efi virtual runtime map passing more robust
On Tue, 17 Dec, at 02:40:06PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:10:24PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > You sunk my i386 battleship,
> >
> > /home/build/git/efi/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c:824:24: error: ‘struct real_mode_header’ has no member named ‘trampoline_pgd’
> > make[4]: *** [arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.o] Error 1
> > make[3]: *** [arch/x86/platform/efi] Error 2
>
> Right, this is a recurring issue with the trampoline_pgd. What do you
> prefer: an #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 or a separate function in efi_$(BITS).c?
Couldn't we do the mapping in efi_setup_page_tables() if we pass
__pa(new_memmap) and 1 << new_memmap_shift as arguments?
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists