[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131217135305.GG3185@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:53:05 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Anson.Huang@...escale.com" <Anson.Huang@...escale.com>
Cc: "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: anatop: add is_enabled interface
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 01:10:12PM +0000, Anson.Huang@...escale.com wrote:
> > In any case I'd be much happier with this patch if it implemented the
> > enable and disable operations as well.
> understand now. then maybe I should remove the PU check in cpufreq,
> although setting PU LDO if it is off before would bring unnessary
> power leak. I will add all these changes together with the dynamic PU
> LDO management feature, thanks for your time!
If you've implemented the enable support correctly then setting the
voltage shouldn't enable the regulator.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists