linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: bias to target cpu load to reduce task moving

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:10:12 +0000
From:	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
Cc:	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
	"fengguang.wu@...el.com" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	"james.hogan@...tec.com" <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
	"jason.low2@...com" <jason.low2@...com>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"hanjun.guo@...aro.org" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: bias to target cpu load to reduce task moving

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:05:56AM +0000, Alex Shi wrote:
> Task migration happens when target just a bit less then source cpu load.
> To reduce such situation happens, aggravate the target cpu load with
> sd->imbalance_pct/100.
> 
> This patch removes the hackbench thread regression on Daniel's
> Intel Core2 server.
> 
> a5d6e63		+patch1~3		+patch1~4
> hackbench -T -s 4096 -l 1000 -g 10 -f 40
> 27.914"         38.694"			28.587"
> 28.390"         38.341"			29.513"
> 28.048"         38.626"			28.706"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index bccdd89..c49b7ba 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static inline unsigned long group_weight(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
>  
>  static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu);
>  static unsigned long source_load(int cpu);
> -static unsigned long target_load(int cpu);
> +static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct);
>  static unsigned long power_of(int cpu);
>  static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, long wl, long wg);
>  
> @@ -3809,11 +3809,17 @@ static unsigned long source_load(int cpu)
>   * Return a high guess at the load of a migration-target cpu weighted
>   * according to the scheduling class and "nice" value.
>   */
> -static unsigned long target_load(int cpu)
> +static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct)
>  {
>  	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>  	unsigned long total = weighted_cpuload(cpu);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * without cpu_load decay, in most of time cpu_load is same as total
> +	 * so we need to make target a bit heavier to reduce task migration
> +	 */
> +	total = total * imbalance_pct / 100;
> +
>  	if (!sched_feat(LB_BIAS))
>  		return total;
>  
> @@ -4033,7 +4039,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
>  	this_cpu  = smp_processor_id();
>  	prev_cpu  = task_cpu(p);
>  	load	  = source_load(prev_cpu);
> -	this_load = target_load(this_cpu);
> +	this_load = target_load(this_cpu, 100);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If sync wakeup then subtract the (maximum possible)
> @@ -4089,7 +4095,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
>  
>  	if (balanced ||
>  	    (this_load <= load &&
> -	     this_load + target_load(prev_cpu) <= tl_per_task)) {
> +	     this_load + target_load(prev_cpu, 100) <= tl_per_task)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * This domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE and
>  		 * p is cache cold in this domain, and
> @@ -4135,7 +4141,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
>  			if (local_group)
>  				load = source_load(i);
>  			else
> -				load = target_load(i);
> +				load = target_load(i, sd->imbalance_pct);

Don't you apply imbalance_pct twice here? Later on in
find_idlest_group() you have:

	if (!idlest || 100*this_load < imbalance*min_load)
		return NULL;

where min_load comes from target_load().


>  
>  			avg_load += load;
>  		}
> @@ -5478,7 +5484,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
>  
>  		/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
>  		if (local_group)
> -			load = target_load(i);
> +			load = target_load(i, env->sd->imbalance_pct);

You probably have the same problem here.

Morten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/