linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] perf timechart: add emphasize option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131217141532.GC6517@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:15:32 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...dex-team.ru>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
	artagnon@...il.com, jolsa@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] perf timechart: add emphasize option

Em Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> wrote:
> > Em Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 02:41:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> wrote:
> > > > Em Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 04:15:22PM +0400, Stanislav Fomichev escreveu:
> > > > > > Please give a sample usage command line and a sample output. (the 
> > > > > > highlighting can be done using ASCII escape sequences in the changelog 
> > > > > > as well.)
> > > > > Highlighting is done in the generated SVG, so I can't really show it in
> > > > > the log or documentation. But I added simple example with -e option.

> > > > > >   -e::
> > > > > >   --emphasize=<duration_nsecs|task_name>::
> > > > > Thanks, added.

> > > > I also wonder how to allocate single letter options here... can we live
> > > > with just --emphasize for now? Wouldn't at some point we maybe want to
> > > > use -e in 'perf timechart' to pick some specific event, and then, to
> > > > make it consistent with the other tools, -e would then be used?

> > > I wanted to raise a similar argument too - so if we don't have to do 
> > > -e then maybe '--grep' would be the better option name?

> > > If it becomes popular then the pattern matching can be improved, 
> > > without having to change the option name and such.

> > Humm, 'grep' is a filter, i.e. something that removes parts of the 
> > data being perused, while this case it will not filter anything, it 
> > will just make something that matches some search criteria to stand 
> > out from the rest, that is still there, so perhaps --emphasize is Ok 
> > albeit kinda long...
> 
> So I frequently use grep with -C 1000 --color=always to also show the 
> context. But --grep-context sounds too long.

Just tried it here, and on fedora 18 one doesn't even needs the
--color=always, but then basic grep usage doesn't imply showing contexts
and highlighting, i.e. grep grew into a swiss knife, like many others
:-\
 
> Maybe --highlight ?

That is ok for me, I think it is better than --emphasize
 
> > Do we have any other command line tool that has a long standing 
> > semantics of "highlighting" or "emphasizing" parts of a data stream?
> 
> Yeah, grep's -C, -A, -B options. (--context, --context-after, 
> --context-before), combined with the --color option to highlight.

I don't feel like there is a direct mapping of what he wants to achieve
to reusing the 'grep' keyword, at least it didn't sound natural at first
sight to me. :-)

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/