lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000014301223b3e-a73f3d59-8234-48f1-9888-9af32709a879-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:17:37 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on.

On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Dave Hansen wrote:

> I'll do some testing and see if I can coax out any delta from the
> optimization myself.  Christoph went to a lot of trouble to put this
> together, so I assumed that he had a really good reason, although the
> changelogs don't really mention any.

The cmpxchg on the struct page avoids disabling interrupts etc and
therefore simplifies the code significantly.

> I honestly can't imagine that a cmpxchg16 is going to be *THAT* much
> cheaper than a per-page spinlock.  The contended case of the cmpxchg is
> way more expensive than spinlock contention for sure.

Make sure slub does not set __CMPXCHG_DOUBLE in the kmem_cache flags
and it will fall back to spinlocks if you want to do a comparison. Most
non x86 arches will use that fallback code.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ